In the 20th century, whenever an awful murder case involved a member of the Roman Catholic clergy, our national media indulged in paroxysms of a religious and delusional nature.
Okay, maybe it's unfair to draw sweeping conclusions with only two examples.
When Sister Pahl was murdered in Toledo in 1980, and Father Robinson arrested in 2004, the media accounts almost universally said that her body was surrounded by burning candles, implying some bizarre ritual / Satanic slaying, some sort of sacrifice to evil. Well, that turned out to be wrong.
But I won't write another rant about the wrongful conviction of Father Gerald Robinson today.... rather, I want to tell you about Father Schmidt.
Hans Schmidt was too handsome to be a priest. But he was ordained anyway. Perhaps not surprisingly, he broke his vows and got a young woman pregnant. (Photos from the Anaconda Standard, via NewspaperArchive.com.)
As sometimes happens to young women who get pregnant, in or out of wedlock, her paramour was displeased, and she ended up in pieces.
But I don't have to write a summary of the story. One of the greatest legal writers of the 20th century, Justice Benjamin Cardozo, whose opinions were so cleverly crafted and so tightly written that they appear in many law school textbooks even today, wrote the appellate opinion confirming Father Schmidt's conviction. In that opinion, he crisply summarized the case:
In September, 1913, the dismembered body of Anna Aumuller was found in the Hudson river. Suspicion pointed to the defendant. He was arrested, and confessed that he had killed the woman by cutting her throat with a knife.
He repeated this confession again and again. He attempted, however, to escape the penalty for murder by the plea that he was insane. He told the physicians who examined him that he had heard the voice of God calling upon him to kill the woman as a sacrifice and atonement. He confessed to a life of unspeakable excesses and hideous crimes, broken, he said, by spells of religious ecstacy and exaltation.
In one of these moments, believing himself, he tells us, in the visible presence of God, he committed this fearful crime. Two physicians of experience, accepting as true his statement that he was overpowered by this delusion, expressed the opinion that he was insane.
Other physicians of experience held the view that his delusion was feigned, and his insanity a sham.
But before it was pointed out that Father Schmidt was a Satanic fraud, the newspapers of America fell in love with the story. Some of the banner headlines even went above the masthead --
True crime author Mark Gado recently wrote a book that explores the murder of Anna Aumuller in detail. It's Killer Priest: The Crimes, Trial, and Execution of Father Hans Schmidt.
Fortunately, the jury and the many appellate judges who reviewed the case were satisfied that neither God nor the Devil made him do it. Father Schmidt was executed as the cruel and perfectly sane girlfriend-killer that he was. Which isn't to say he didn't receive a warm reception in the lowest pits of you-know-where. And I can't help but remark, I can't help but point out how the Satanic/ritual malarkey failed the smell test nearly a century ago, while a much more "modern" jury of today accepted this hokum in Father Robinson's case.
Laura -
I lived in Toledo at the time of the murder and there was actually very little written or televised about the murder of Sr. Margaret.
Keep in mind, that in the 1980s the local catholic church was still pulling the puppet strings of both the media and law enforcement.
So your suggestion that early media accounts implied that this was a satanic murder is just not accurate.
I've got three newspaper articles from the April/May 1980 right in front of me and none of them reference candles or imply anything about rituals.
Sure, there were rumors about this murder swirling around Toledo for years. And really, why wouldn't there be? An slightly-built elderly nun is stabbed nearly 30 times in a chapel on the eve or her birthday and the eve of Easter? That is a tragedy that you'd think would be discussed over and over again, but the truth is that beyond these news articles there was not one official "peep" about the murder until the arrest of Robinson in 2004.
The fact that this wasn't mentioned officially again for 20 years is what is the most strange to me.
Also, I did write in another post that the media accounts didn't mention much about her being sexually assaulted. These early news accounts wrote that she was molested and pretty much downplayed it. They wrote nothing about her undergarments being pulled down or her dress being neatly rolled up. That was not revealed until recently. I believe that the medical examiner determined that she was raped with some type of "something." I think at the time, there was probably a strong desire by the media to preserve her dignity as much as there was a strong desire to preserve the image of the institutional church in all of this.
I just wish that the Robinson defense team would go after the records at the diocese. If their internal investigation reveals something that would exonerate their client it seems to me that the defense is obligated to go after it.
Posted by: holytoledo | April 27, 2007 at 09:47 AM
I was wondering when you would weigh in again.
I have read dozens of newspaper accounts on NewspaperArchive.com, including many articles from the Toledo Blade. They clearly and repeatedly said that Sister Pahl may have been sexually assaulted, and the articles from 2004 about Robinson's arrest repeatedly said that there were burning candles around her body. I'll go and get a screen capture of one to prove it to you and add it to this post. I can't find an "early" account because the Toledo Blade has been taken out of the archive, why I don't know, so I can't state that the articles from 1980 included this detail, but I specifically recall that they did. Since I can't prove it to you, I'll delete the word early.
But frankly the dissemination of this gross misstatement of fact in 2004 was more harmful. It was more likely to be read by the jury pool. It was less forgivable because there was no deadline involved.
Posted by: Laura | April 27, 2007 at 10:04 AM
PS the Toledo Blade archive is no longer on NewspaperArchive.com. It was yanked a few months ago, I'm not sure why. But the Associated Press was vigorous in reporting the "lit candles" thing, and that is the account that made it into many, many newspapers across Ohio.
Posted by: Laura | April 27, 2007 at 10:13 AM
Ah, this was the "pillowcase case." An early example of CSI-type detection which received nation-wide headlines at the time. The body, or significant bits of it, was stuffed in a pillowcase. Detectives traced the manufacturer, the retailer and finally the customer, and identified the victim and her killer.
Posted by: L. Manning | April 29, 2007 at 12:45 AM